Dave Dodgson video-blogged earlier this month about a side of language teaching that rarely gets honestly owned let alone blogged about–lessons gone awry. When he casually declares that “it’s time to acknowledge the things that don’t work and the times when everything went wrong,” I doubt he suspected that it would become my new maxim–no, not a maxim prompting me to regularly air my dirty lesson laundry out for everyone (there’s not that much of it anyway–he says with a sheepish grin), but rather a reflection on why it didn’t work when I thought it would and subsequent lessons learnt. Having said that, here’s some dirty lesson laundry for you stare at with disgust, take down in rage and wash incessantly.
In my EAP writing classes, I always have one or two days near the end of a term where I want to throw in some last-minute stylistic points with regards to academic writing and hence I’ve put together a lesson called the The Curious Rules of Writers Part 1, mostly because they’re odd-end, one-off rules that in most cases don’t deserve or expand well into an entire class alone. I planned it as a somewhat rapid-fire look at several guidelines. The handout includes the first page, which has simplified rules, with which students work in pairs. The second page, which includes the various rules, is cut up, distributed one to each group and passed around when completed. The idea was that when Pair A got #5, for example, they’d think about it, find its simpler meaning on their handout, write what’s on the cut-up paper into “Example” and then correct it in “Correction”. When completed, pass it onto the next pair and wait for a new one to land on their desks. Several problems ensued:
1. There inevitably would be a traffic jam in the middle of the class.
a) Some pairs were much slower than others and therefore a bunch of rules would form a pile at their desks without any getting through to the next pair.
b) Some rules are more complex than others and pairs would get stuck on them for much longer, leaving their successive grouping without any rules.
2. Some rules contained items difficult to identify.
Take #3 – Avoid clichés like the plague. (They’re old hat.), for example. Students may understand what is meant but have no idea what is considered clichés . This is actually quite difficult to both explain and think of more examples yourself.
3. Student handouts became mazes of examples and corrections written everywhere.
Clearly I didn’t give a lot of thought to the amount of space needed to write two sentences for every guideline. As a result, much of the meaningful content became jumbled scribblings, which undoubtedly wasn’t rewritten or typed up after class.
4. This takes up a lot longer than one expects.
You’d think that if students spent 3 minutes on each and passed it on, the activity would take up the better part of an hour with some time left over during a 90-minute class for taking it up together. Wrong!
If you can believe it, I did this lesson identically twice with the same problems arising both times before rethinking its implementation. Thankfully, retrospection, reflection and collaboration with colleagues brought about changes that ultimately addressed these challenges and the third time was the charm. I’ll let you R, R & C this initial activity and see what you come up with as solutions before telling you what I changed.